And You're Suggestion Is?

By Rich Kozlovich

Over recent months were seeing what's become an obsession with leftists, Democrats, RINO's, and the weak minded criticizing everything Trump says and does, and truthfully, I think he likes it as it gives him the opportunity to snark them. 

One of the unending memes among the Trump Dementia Syndrome crowd is how he's vile because he's been too accommodating to Putin who has been killing women and children in his attacks on Ukraine, in his efforts to get a peace plan put in place.  Yet, I think Zelenskyy got what he deserved, and everyone knows what a vile man Putin is, and everyone also knows he’s a reality that must be dealt with.  These critics never answer how he should be handled.  

But it really doesn't seem to matter what the subject is, the pattern's the same.  They claim his tariffs are going to destroy America, in spite of the fact all these nations are doing exactly what Putin said they would do.  Come to him wagging their tails to Trump, and headline after headline bears this out.

I’m not a knee jerk approver of Trump, which I find to be true among my conservative friends.  I think the Canada thing is insane, I think the Gulf of Mexico thing is foolish, yet how can anyone not recognize what he's accomplished, in both terms, but nothing like he has this term. These critics suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, and that can’t be qualified as anything less than a mental disorder.

I've seen someone call Trump's cabinet a bunch of lemmings, toadies, yes men, sycophants, and mouth pieces for Trump, and I have to ask why?  Is he supposed to have picked those who agree with him or disagree with him?  Is he supposed to pick those who are philosophically opposed to his agenda, backstabbing him at every turn, or should he have picked believers in his agenda?  That was a failure from his first term he wasn't going to repeat again.   

The cabinet isn't an advisory board, they're hired help, and while it's their job to give their views on the agenda, once the President makes a decision, it's their job to salute and say yes sir, carry out his orders, or find other employment. 

Trump isn’t damaging America’s standing in the world, he’s repairing the damage of the Obama/Biden administrations by slapping them upside the head and letting them know there’s a new sheriff in town and they better get their acts together or else, and they are.   And truth be told, I don’t care what the rest of the world thinks, as they’re either enemies, leaky vessels as allies, or leeches, and we owe them … Nothing!

The western world's leaders are divided into three groups. The Winston Churchill’s, the Neville Chamberlain’s, and the Vidkun Quisling's, who are traitors that blend in well with the go along to get along crowd.  Everyone loves the Chamberlain’s, they’re go along to get along guys.  Everyone hates the Churchill’s, who just can’t seem to get along. At least until the go along to get along crowd’s failure to deal with what’s going wrong hits the fan.  Then, all of a sudden, they discover they need a Winston Churchill to be the answer, and they hate it, and they hate him. 

And no matter how successful a Churchill may be, they just can’t stop shooting arrows at the Churchill’s. Why? He’s not one of them, and that’s the only thing they’re any good at, criticism, not problem solving.  The Democrat party, epitomizes the Chamberlain/Quisling philosophical paradigm.  

Go along to get along elitism is a human physiological disorder that’s been ubiquitous throughout human history, and it’s always going to be with us.  Most leaders aren’t leaders, they’re managers who organize the direction everyone wants to go, no matter how foolish that direction may be. 

A real leader is willing to stand up and say: You’re all wrong, and I’m gonna tell you why.  And if they’re successful, they’re hated all the more.  So, that brings me to this.

1. Is there anyone else in American politics that could bring all these nations wagging their tails to cut good deals?
2. Is there any American politician who would have cut into the Deep State as Trump has?
3. Is there any American politician who would have taken such a strong stand against illegal immigration and deportation?
4. Is there any America politician who would challenge the corrupt out of control federal judiciary?
5. Is there any American politician who would have taken on public and higher education for a major fix?
6. Is there any other America politician who would have managed to cut billion of dollars in wasted and corrupt spending as he has? 

And that’s the tip of the iceberg as in this article by Andrea Widburg points out, and all done in less than four months.  If so, please tell us who it is. As it is, there are three choices.

1. Democrats who are blatantly insane like Cory Booker, AOC, Buttigieg, Rahm Emanuel, Kamala, Jasmine Crockett, Josh Shapiro, J.B. Pritzker or Andy Beshear, who are all now testing the water to see how hot it is.
2. RINOs, who are almost as insane, none of whom are even thinking of running in 2028.
3. Or, a false conservative who will buckle at the first sign of trouble, and I don't see any of them willing to put themselves into that meat grinder, as they know they can't survive a history search from the alternative media. 

So, I'm asking these mentally and intellectually challenged TDS patients to name who they think is best qualified to lead America to social, economic, and international stability.  Oh, wait, I know. Karl Marx!