Hallelujah! Hallelujah!
Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah,
hallelujah, hallelujah. For Kamala Now Reigneth. (Democrat variation
to Handel's Hallelujah Chorus)
By Rich Kozlovich
Editor's Note: This is part two in this series starting with part one, So, It's Kamala? Really? Then We Need a Little History Lesson! RK
Who is Kamala Harris? Well, let's start out with this quote:
Kamala
is young, dynamic, brilliant, incisive, gentle, tough, austere, earthy,
restrained and a rapper, incredibly successful as a key figure in the
greatest Presidency in Paul Krugman’s memory, yet humble. She’s blacker
than blaque, yet whiter than white. That little girl was her,
but she’s unencumbered by the past, while recognizing that all black
people are burdened by the invisible systemic racism of the present, and
consequently have the right to burn down whole city blocks, then get
their bail paid. Her sweeping intellect transcends mere
logic, rising to levels more remarkable than is markable. Whatever she
may have said may be said to be unsaid, depending on what voices from
our future remain unheard. - Alan Stevens
Yesterday
she was as incomprehensible as Joe Biden, but without the
excuse of dementia, and today she’s the ultimate, highest-ranking
expression of DEI virtue ever. DEI is the most noble, virtuous height
to which human beings can reach, yet anyone mentioning Kamala’s towering
achievement
is racist and sexist. Kamala
has innumerable accomplishments as Vice President, yet she doesn’t. On
the Afghanistan debacle, she was the “last person in the room,” Biden’s
indispensable adviser, yet suddenly, she had nothing to do with
Afghanistan.
So, it must be true! Right? After all, the media wouldn't lie! Would they? Hmmmmm, perhaps we might wish to explore that.
On July the
Wall Street Journal, which
used to be a good newspaper before the Murdoch's bought it, claimed
Kamala was now leading Trump by two percentage points, while Trump was
leading Biden by six. It was noted:
Propagandists working on behalf of Kamala Harris are trying to
introduce her as Obama 2.0: As a “person of color,” she would not only
be the first woman president but the first African-American black woman.
Except that, like Obama, she is mixed race. And she’s not
African-American, either. Her father, Donald Harris, is described as
African-Jamaican. Her birth mother was from India. Am I permitted to report this? Not only is her father a “combative” retired “Marxist” professor of economics, his family owned slaves.
The media’s goal is to untie Kamala from her history. In his article The Kamala Coverup Begins Daniel Greenfield Daniel Greenfield quotes George Orwell in his book 1984 saying:
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been
rewritten, every picture has been repainted… And that process is
continuing day by day and minute by minute.”
He goes on to say:
This is what the media did with Obama. It more casually tried to do
this with Biden, but never really committed to it because he wasn’t seen
as an ideological champion, but as the seat-warmer and placeholder he
proved to be. Kamala has however now been branded as an ideological
champion which means that history must be urgently rewritten and a cult
of personality manufactured
Kamala, whose been noted for give speeches that were incomprehensible word salads now give speeches that blow the media away. And now we're finding this ‘Orwellian’
trend to obfuscate the reality of Kamala, including her
failure as the "border czar", claiming she really wasn't the Border
Czar. In fact, according to the media, the "czar" title is a Republican invention, yet CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC called her the ‘Border Czar’.
As media gears itself up to not only suppress
the truth about Kamala, and the fact she was one of the most far left
Senators in the Congress, they want it to cease to exist. She not only
should be exempt from criticism, anyone who does criticize her is a racist, and telling the truth about Kamala is extremely offensive and dehumanizing’. But it's okay for Joy Reid to say "people of color’ who do not vote for Harris are "real weird". Yet Black Lives Matter is up set at her "promotion".
At this point the media is all in to conspire to make Kamala Harris
something she is not. Acceptable to America. You see, all those
extremists views and associations she associated herself with weren't
really sincere. Not really what she believed. She was just trying to appease the left, and now she's different. They're gaslighting America, and it's all an effort to distract us from the real Kamala, which Barbara Boxer, a full fledged leftist nitwit, calls Kamala "mainstream". Yeah, sure, and that stream runs right through the now defunct USSR.
It's clear the media is totally corrupt,
historically ignorant, and logically challenged. Has it ever been different? No!
In days gone by the media, which consisted of newspapers only, lied,
postured and supported the same kind of clowns who are in office now.
The only
real difference was they were open in their biases. The media managed to
convince people by getting a degree in journalism it made them impartial
distributors of "truth". That was a lie from the beginning!
It
wasn't that long ago the media proclaimed loud and clear Biden was
sharp as a tack, and totally engaged in the affairs of the nation, and
Kamala was a nitwit. After the debate it became clear Biden was the
demented loser conservatives said he was, and then.... Shazam... Kamala
was the new Democrat Messiah,:
The most gifted,
compelling, and beatific woman ever to grace the planet. She is nothing
less than a female messiah. To besmirch the Lightbringer 2.0 in any way,
shape, or form would be an assault on all things decent and beautiful."......... She isn’t the Messiah. She’s a
mess....
When
I
see them continuously spewing out all the leftist claptrap they espouse,
the lies, the misdirection, the misrepresentation of facts, the
projection, and logical fallacies, all in
spite of all the historical evidence that shows these views are
irrational,
misanthropic and morally defective, I have to wonder if they aren't
insane. I
know they're corrupt, irrational, morally defective, and untruthful, but
are they sane?
No comments:
Post a Comment