“Among many activists, regulators and legislators, there is a
pervasive myth that a little over-regulation never hurt anybody. But a
"little" here and a "little" there adds up. The reality is that today
regulation exacts societal costs whose magnitude is almost unimaginable. Bjorn Lomborg
By Rich Kozlovich and Jay Lehr
I know that I we're really dating ourselves, but back in the 50's and 60's there was a weekly political new and called The Ev and Charlie Show. And yes, they had them in the 50's. It was a bit like Crossfire, except that they understood the concept of good manners, and the two Senators,
Everett Dirkson and
Charles Halleck, were both Republican. Dirkson was a gravelly voiced smooth tongued Senator from
Illinois who died in 1969. He made a statement that is still one of the
most famous and much quoted statements when it comes to government
taxing and spending:
“A billion here and a billion there, pretty soon you’re talking about real money.”
Dirkson
was considered a conservative when it came to fiscal matters, but a
socially liberal, and when it came to social matters he yet voted consistently to
expand regulations. He also thought Nixon was one of the most influential men governing the country. Which was true, but more on that later.
It makes one wonder how anyone can be intellectually
honest and think that expanding the size of government and increasing
regulations will cost less money, or be spent more wisely by bureaucrats than the people of America with more
regulations. Perhaps the statement he should have posed is this:
A few regulations here and a few regulations there and the first thing you know you have tyranny.
There actually are people, while noting the downside to regulations, claim regulations create jobs, economic stability and growth, at least that's what they say. While it's irrational to think any society can function effectively without some regulatory impact, I think it's more than appropriate to ask: Just how many regulations does a society need? Is there a limit? How many regulations can be imposed on society before they become detrimental? Dan Mitchell makes some worthwhile observations regarding growth and sane regulatory policy in his article, The Pro-Growth Impact of Deregulation. Then there's the massiveness and complexity of all these regulations. According to the Competitive Enterprise Institute, in
2019 regulations (in effect hidden taxes) was estimated to cost the American public $1.9 trillion dollars. Higher than all the corporate and personal income taxes combined. The cost per household? $14, 615 dollars annually. To make an interesting comparison: If the regulatory state was an independent country, that would make them the ninth largest economy in the world. Here's a list of the number of laws and regulations passed between 2003 and 2020. Between 2002 and 1989 there were 63, 284 rules imposed on the nation by the Administrative state. I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.
- Editor's Note: Here's the table for federal regulations from 1936 to 2020 with additional "eyes rolling back into your head" charts.
In 2013 the United States Congress was criticized for not
getting things done. The Congress “only” passed 65 new laws. Of course we have
to understand that one year they passed over three hundred new laws.
What is really important to understand is when new laws
are passed the baton of power is passed to the permanent bureaucracies, whose
function is to make even more laws called – “rules”! In 2013 there was an
average of 56 new regulations resulting from each law passed totaling 3659 new laws
called – “rules”! That multiplier has been as low as 12 per new law, but that
was in 2006 when Congress passed 321 new laws. If you average out the
multipliers over the last ten years the average multiplier is 25.36.
So what’s the rest of the story? In Part Two we'll expand on this, but you may be asking: What has any of this to do with Carthage? We're coming to that in Part Two
No comments:
Post a Comment