L.A. Riots, Part III

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags:

As we watch these "mostly peaceful" and totally "spontaneous" acts of murder, looting, destruction of private property, and out of control violence it's been obvious many of these "mostly peaceful" rioters are paid protestors, and that same pattern is playing out in Los Angeles.  But this time there's a new sheriff in town and he wants to know who's paying for all of this, and since this clearly is a paid insurrection, he sent in the Marines, and he's making sure the DOJ is going to find out who's providing the body armor and face masks, none of which is cheap.

• Who Is Handing Out Face Shields and Other Tactical Gear to Rioters, and Who Is Paying for It? - Somehow, the narrative that the Los Angeles rioters are a spontaneous gathering of peaceful, concerned citizens always seems to fall apart just as it's about to go viral.... 
•  FBI probes foreign, domestic funding behind anti-ICE riots - FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed the bureau is actively investigating financial networks behind the escalating anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. The unrest, which began as protests over immigration raids, has turned violent—raising alarms about foreign interference and taxpayer-funded activism.,,,,
• FBI Investigating Money Trail Behind Los Angeles Riots, Patel Says - The FBI is investigating what is fueling the riots against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, the agency’s director Kash Patel said.  “The FBI is investigating any and all monetary connections responsible for these riots,” Patel told The Epoch Times in response to rising concerns about possible Chinese influence behind the chaos. One group backing the unrest is the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a communist political party linked to networks funded by pro-Beijing tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham.

I'll tell you what, we'll come back to Neville Roy Singham.  

These foot soldiers of the Democrat party are illegal aliens, communists, socialists, Antifa, Marxists, and Islamists, all of whom are at war with the federal government and these Mexican and Palestinian flag wavers and were funded by socialist NGOs, which are funded by the federal government, which is a bit startling, and as you read the article you realize this is extensive. "Civil rights attorney Laura Powell posted on X that the groups behind the seven violent protests are awash in government grants. "Government grants" means that you're paying for the rope to hang yourself."

•  Check Out the Taxpayer-Funded Nonprofit Behind the Anti-ICE Riots in Los Angeles -  If anyone thinks these anti-ICE riots in LA are organic, we've got a lovely bridge for sale ... We get it, the Left, Democrats, and the mainstream media really want us all to believe these brave people are just rising up because they're so passionate about protecting IMMIGRANTS from evil, fascist Trump, but C'MON already......
• “Bionic Shields” Bodes The Question: Who’s Funding These Riots?It’s time to find the head of the treasonous snake who is aiding and abetting these thugs and to chop it off as an example for future radical protests......
• Turns Out Traitor Joe’s DHS Funded the Group Behind the LA Riots - The Department of Homeland Security is funding one of the groups that is staging protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which falls under DHS. War Room's Natalie Winters shared the shocking information on X, showing that DHS, under the Biden administration,  gave a project grant to Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) in the amount of $450,000... 
• Evidence suggests Los Angeles 'riots' over ICE raids could be government-funded - What began as a so-called "spontaneous protest" against ICE enforcement operations in Los Angeles has now been exposed as something far more insidious: a well-funded, coordinated riot, with ties to radical left-wing organizations, government-backed NGOs, and even a billionaire known for pushing Chinese Communist propaganda...
• Governor Newscum and Democrat Lawmakers Take Funds From Police to Fund the Communist Uprising - California State Rep. Carl DeMaio is fighting for Prop 36 which stiffens penalties for serious crimes (see below). What he is getting from Gavin Newsom is the opposite. Gov. Gavin ‘Pomade’  Newsom and California Democrats just released a budget that cuts law enforcement. To make matters worse, it gives those funds to groups behind the violent Los Angeles riots...
• FBI Arrests Commie Riot Supplier and Known Member of the Brown Berets Terrorist Organization - The first rule in unraveling conspiracies: Follow the money. Earlier this week, FBI Director Kash Patel declared that the riots in Los Angele are not organic spillovers from extemporaneous protests against ICE, but well-funded operations designed to create mayhem in the streets. The point of the riots is to terrorize communities and intimidate federal law enforcement from carrying out legitimate operations, Patel said at the time, and the FBI planned to roll up the conspirators forthwith.....
• California Democrats Dumped $73M into Migrant NGOs Opposing ICE - California’s Democrat-controlled state legislature has pushed tens of millions of tax dollars into the hands of non-governmental organizations that work to thwart deportation and out ICE agents, according to a report......

The funding is massive and it's a shared endeavor, which brings me back to Neville Singham, who it's claimed is "the communist behind the “organic” riots in Los Angeles and across the country are being funded by Neville Singham, according to DataRepublican and Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna."

 

And who are the people ICE is sweeping up in their raids?

“Murderers, pedophiles, and drug traffickers. These are the types of criminal illegal aliens that rioters are fighting to protect. How much longer will Governor Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass continue to prioritize these criminal illegal aliens over their own citizens?” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “Secretary Noem has a message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. ICE will continue to enforce the law and arrest criminal illegal aliens.”

As for the celebrity  who are coming out in droves to support these terrorists, I think it's a good idea to ask them which child molesters, murderers, rapists, and organized criminal thugs would they like to have living near them?  And I really love it when someone like Eva Longoria, who lives in a mansion in Spain, is so emotional about how terribly un-American it is for ICE to enforce American laws she just starts crying.  

Immigration Jihad Isn't a Conspiracy Theory. It's a Conspiracy! It's History!

By Rich Kozlovich 

Don't delude  yourself into believing immigration to America won't change America.  It did in the past, it's doing it now, and it will do it in the future.  In the past the changes weren't as dramatic as we're seeing now because most of the immigrants came from cultures based on Judaic/Christian principles, and America was universally considered a Christian nation, albeit, without a national religion.   The left has been working to destroy the Judaic/Christian ethic  since the French Revolution.  Obama did his best to bringing about that change as much as possible, and the Biden administration went all out on it. 

Lars Møller posted this article, Barbarians at the Gate saying:

The fact that migrants, whatever their origin, single out the West as the destination of their perilous journey is due to the expectation of prosperity rather than admiration of Western values. Of course, they are indifferent to the exhortations of the Gospels, the critical thinking of the Enlightenment, and freedom of speech. Inadvertently, they are the invaders and spearhead colonizers of our time, driven by basic motives such as envy and greed. What “infidels” have in the West, they also want for themselves........While the Visigoths and Franks fought for everything they held dear when they were attacked by the Moors, the French of today have already given up the fight for freedom and resigned themselves to a self-inflicted destiny as dhimmis. 

In Germany the North African crime rate "for rape is up 169% and Murder up 110% in 4 years", and, Muammar Gaddafi, the epitome of a sly, capricious tyrant" stated:

 Europe, the ancient stronghold of Christianity (and the refuge for Christians persecuted in the Middle East and Africa), would eventually be conquered by Muslims, though thanks to baby carriages rather than tanks......We have fifty million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe.....

In the late 1800's Otto Von Bismarck stated Europe isn't a country.  Unlike the United States, which shares a mostly same culture and language, Europe is a geographical designation, all speaking different languages with different foundational social paradigms, many times within the same countries.   Europe is currently made up of 44 countries, those countries have history, a history of reckless values heedless of the consequences of those actions.   Nations that were small and yet were in control of empires, are now third rate countries, in a second rate continent with histories of mutual hate and loathing.  

Europe is doomed. It now seems clear we're seeing the beginning of an uprising in the ethnic European populations. The elitists in power intend to destroy that via police/military actions. 

The result?

There are two options. There will be civil war on a massive scale all over Europe, or Europe will be consumed by Islam, and then the violence will never end, and these globalists who've embraced this will find they're not in control as they hoped to be.  Once Pandora's box is opened, and civil unrest is unleashed, it can't be totally closed.....ever.

No matter what course is taken, Europe as we know it is doomed, demographically, culturally, socially, and economically. Their historical end cycle is now, and all end cycles result in massive economic downturns and violence.  What will emerge when the new cycle begins is hard to predict, but I'm betting what ever emerges will not bring Europe back out of the pit they've dug themselves into.

Also, I'm currently reading Tony Judt's book, Postwar, A History of Europe Since 1945. While this was written in 2006, it's just as insightful now as it was then. I recommend it, as the patterns play out over and over again, and his book demonstrates that.

Who Were the Secret Service Protecting?

 

 By Rich Kozlovich

Well, finally one of the incompetents Biden appointed to an important position has resigned for her incompetence.  Or was it incompetence?  

• FACT-CHECK: Female Secret Service Applicants Are NOT Held to ‘Same Standards’ as Men.

Kimberly Cheatle has resigned after testifying she believed she was the best person around to keep heading up the Secret Service.  Why?  Because she was pretty much bereft of defenders, even Democrats attacked her.  Were there other reasons for her resignation?  Only time will tell. 

In the meanwhile there are questions be asked based on what is now absolutely known, and one writer even wondered who Secret Service thought they were there to protect, Trump or Crooks.

1. He wandered without hindrance at the rally.
2. He settled in the most obvious location for his shot, and was observed doing so 20 minutes before the shooting, of which the Secret Service was aware.  One officer had Crooks point a gun at him and he fell off the roof, before the shooting.  That alone should have triggered an assault on Crooks.
   
3. Two officers abandoned their post in spite of that knowledge.
4. He was carrying a rifle, and he was carrying a range finder and the Secret Service knew about it.
5. Ordinary citizens tried to warn police and were ignored.
   
6. Police claimed they told the Secret Service, and they did nothing.
   
7. The Secret Service had previously identified that location as the best location for an assassination attempt and it was not guarded.  A location he managed to get to and shoot Trump without hindrance.
8. The Beaver County sniper team saw and photographed him a full four minutes before the shooting. 
9.  When the Secret Service sniper saw him on the roof with a rifle why didn't they shoot?  We now know there were a full 26 minutes to prevent the assassin from shooting at Trump.  It's also reported "at least one sniper/spotter team had the assassin in their sights for some three minutes but were denied clearance to shoot".  If that's true, then who refused permission to shoot, and why?  Is this failure by the Secret Service just blatant incompetence on the part of the Secret Service, or was it more?

All this was known to the Secret Service and yet no one prevented Trump from standing up in front of that audience, which is standard operating procedure in that kind of situation, allowing Trump to be Crooks' target, and no one prevented Crooks from setting up his target.  And now there's talk about evidence of a second shooter.

All nine bullet points outline serious violations of the operational procedures for the Secret Service giving way to the question: Who were they protecting? 

•  Geo-Tracking Reveals Thomas Crooks’ Link To DC - Now, the Oversight Project, a watchdog group with the Heritage Foundation, released a report that could potentially link Thomas Crooks, a relatively unknown figure until now, to critical locations in the Washington D.C. area. According to the group’s findings, geo-tracking data from various devices suggests that Crooks had been in close proximity to key sites, including the FBI headquarters and Allegheny Arms—a location of particular interest to investigators.
• Pennsylvania Police Commissioner Reveals That Three More Individuals Were Identified as Suspicious Prior to the Assassination Attempt - The Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner, Colonel Christopher Paris, disclosed that not one, but four individuals were flagged as suspicious during former President Donald Trump’s rally at Butler, PA on July 13, 2024.......

As the story unfolds there's a lot of disturbing facts emerging indicating planning, advanced technology, and potential unexplained connections, along with a awful lot of unexplained security reactions.   I'm now convinced this is a story that has tentacles that reach farther, deeper, and wider than I initially thought, and it needs to be investigated far more seriously than it is, since the FBI and the DHS are taking on that responsibility, and no one trusts them.  I think it's not unreasonable to say there won't be a proper investigation until Trump is elected.   

 So, what do we have here?  Another conspiracy theory?   Let's try and get this right once, just once, please.  There's a difference between conspiracy theorists and those who believe in conspiracies.  Conspiracy theorists create these unfounded scenarios in order to try and make sense of a complicated world.  Whereas those who believe in conspiracies have read a history book..... or two, and they know all this clabber about how there's not such thing as a conspiracy, ergo, conspiracies don't exist, just isn't true!  There have been secret plans, i.e., conspiracies, throughout human history.  There's no reason to believe anything have changed.  People will be people, and the patterns of life repeat over and over again.

So, what do we have here?  Another conspiracy theory?  Well, that's how all conspiracies are exposed, by theorizing they exist, and then investigated, that's science.   In this case criminal science.  And time has shown an awful lot of these conspiracy theories turn out to be conspiracy fact.  However, let's not obfuscate this fact.  There' just no end to the rank incompetence in the Biden administration, and no matter what else is likely to be uncovered, that's blatantly obvious.