President Trump and Energy Secretary Perry are both vocal skeptics of climate change alarmism, but the US Energy Department is still running one of the top drivers of alarmist science for the United Nations. This engine of alarmism is obscurely named the Climate Model Intercomparison Project or CMIP. Climate change alarmism is based entirely on computer modeling and CMIP is where the core modeling comes from.
What CMIP does is provide the computer climate modeling for the infamous UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s leading proponent of alarmist science. CMIP itself is a UN activity, part of the UN’s World Climate Research Program. The modeling is done by major climate modeling centers around the world, including a number of US federal agencies. So while the Trump Administrations says it does not support the IPCC, it is actually doing a lot of free work for it.
This should stop..........To Read More....
My Take - Jacques Chirac, former President of France said of the Kyoto Accords: This is the first step in global governance. Make no mistake about this. Environment issues are nothing more than the spear point of socialist world governance under control of the most corrupt incompetent organization the world has ever know - the United Nations.
Then of course there's the Law of the Sea Treaty that would turn over the world's oceans to be administered by the United Nations. Guess who thought that was just a grand idea? George W. Bush and Condolezza Rice.....and that's when they were in office.
Adherence to the Kyoto Accords was touted as an absolute necessity to save the Earth, so why is Kyoto dying? Why is it the American public as a whole doesn't even have global warming on their radar as a problem?
- Is it because it's stupid?
- Was it because it's unscientific?
- Was because it's impractical?
- Would it have accomplished the goals set in the agreement?
- Was it in reality all politics?
Answers;
Yes, yes, yes, no, yes.
Now that real science presented by real scientists is well on the way of putting the Kyoto Accord and Anthropogenic Climate Change in the dust bin of history maybe it is a good time to look at that other junk science “global problem solver” treaty. The Montreal Protocol, which caused us to lose methyl bromide.
We can only hope!
Then we might take a shot at repealing the ban on DDT. Unless I've missed something that ban was not accomplished by legislation. It was imposed by the first director of EPA, William Doyle Ruckelshaus. If that's so, and I think it is, and we know all the claims about DDT are not only unscientific, they're based on the lies told by Rachel Carson in her book Silent Spring, why don't we petition the current director of EPA to revoke the ban?
I've been told by greenies over and over again that Rachel Carson didn't call for the ban on DDT, and they're right. But after reading her book no reasonable person could come to any other conclusion. Convenient wasn't it?
The Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Accord are both junk science. The science was never very strong in the beginning and as time goes by it has become even less tenable.
Pest controllers or “exterminators”, which is what we all are, who continue to invalidate 70 years of quality pest control provided by our industry to the public with their compromising attitudes to all this green sponsored balderdash - I say shame on you!
As you follow the events surrounding global warming (Kyoto Accord), Law of the Sea Treaty, Montreal Protocol, the efforts by globalists to take over the internet, presumably to allow for greater flow of information (countries like Libya, North Korea, China, etc. are really concerned about this) and now the Cybercrime Treaty you can’t help but come to the conclusion that Jacques Chirac was right when he said that Kyoto was the first step in global governance.
I know, I know, there's no such thing as a conspiracy.....unless of course it's a vast right wing conspiracy. .
We can only hope!
Then we might take a shot at repealing the ban on DDT. Unless I've missed something that ban was not accomplished by legislation. It was imposed by the first director of EPA, William Doyle Ruckelshaus. If that's so, and I think it is, and we know all the claims about DDT are not only unscientific, they're based on the lies told by Rachel Carson in her book Silent Spring, why don't we petition the current director of EPA to revoke the ban?
I've been told by greenies over and over again that Rachel Carson didn't call for the ban on DDT, and they're right. But after reading her book no reasonable person could come to any other conclusion. Convenient wasn't it?
The Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Accord are both junk science. The science was never very strong in the beginning and as time goes by it has become even less tenable.
Pest controllers or “exterminators”, which is what we all are, who continue to invalidate 70 years of quality pest control provided by our industry to the public with their compromising attitudes to all this green sponsored balderdash - I say shame on you!
As you follow the events surrounding global warming (Kyoto Accord), Law of the Sea Treaty, Montreal Protocol, the efforts by globalists to take over the internet, presumably to allow for greater flow of information (countries like Libya, North Korea, China, etc. are really concerned about this) and now the Cybercrime Treaty you can’t help but come to the conclusion that Jacques Chirac was right when he said that Kyoto was the first step in global governance.
I know, I know, there's no such thing as a conspiracy.....unless of course it's a vast right wing conspiracy. .
No comments:
Post a Comment